EPA Whistleblower Reveals Startling Treatment of Scientists Over Chemical Concerns

An internal investigation by the EPA watchdog reveals disturbing retaliation against scientists advocating for higher chemical toxicity levels.

At a Glance

Government scientists alleged EPA managers pressured them to make new chemicals seem safer.
Scientists were encouraged to delete evidence showing chemicals’ harms like cancer and neurological problems.
EPA inspector general confirmed retaliatory actions against three scientists.
EPA called to take corrective action, including suspending supervisors violating the Whistleblower Protection Act.
Concerns about industry pressure on the EPA’s chemical approval process are ongoing.

EPA Watchdog Finds Retaliation

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) watchdog has disclosed troubling findings of retaliation against three scientists. These scientists had advocated for higher toxicity levels for certain chemicals, which contrasted with senior EPA officials’ positions. The investigation found punitive actions like unfavorable performance appraisals, withholding of bonuses, and reassignments to different roles.

Significant pressure according to the report, was placed on the scientists to delete evidence of chemical harms, including links to cancer, miscarriages, and neurological issues.

The EPA inspector general determined that these actions amounted to retaliation. Reports confirmed retaliatory actions including negative reviews, reassignments, and denial of awards. Whistleblowers detailed personal attacks by supervisors, further compounding the hostile work environment.

Call for Corrective Action

The EPA has been called to take corrective action, including suspending supervisors who violated the Whistleblower Protection Act. Future reports are expected on the scientific allegations made by the whistleblowers. To address these concerns, the EPA plans to hold refresher training on scientific integrity and the Whistleblower Protection Act.

EPA officials retaliated against 3 scientists, watchdog says https://t.co/ktodQLJbFD

— The Hill (@thehill) September 19, 2024

Impact and Continuing Issues

The report has linked these issues to the atmosphere under the Trump administration. The EPA claims improvements have been made under Administrator Michael Regan. The Trump campaign did not respond to requests for comment. There’s concern about future interference with EPA’s scientific work under a potential second Trump presidency.

“I’m worried about the future because there are groups out there pushing for changes to the civil service that would make it so I could be fired and replaced with a non-scientist,” said Phillips, a chemist.

Project 2025, a future initiative, proposes quick approval of new chemicals and changing federal employees to at-will workers, which may make it easier to dismiss dissenting voices. Scientists worry about underlying problems not adequately addressed, fearing worsening conditions.