
Florida’s relentless march to 16 executions in 2025 has forced the nation to confront how, why, and whom the state chooses to kill—and no one can look away when so many of those executed wore a uniform before their crimes.
Story Snapshot
- Florida set a national record with 16 executions in 2025, leading the country in capital punishment.
- Military veterans, including Bryan Jennings, form a significant portion of those executed, igniting debate about trauma and justice.
- Governor Ron DeSantis accelerated executions, leveraging non-unanimous jury recommendations and minimal clemency oversight.
- The state’s approach has drawn sharp criticism and support, raising new questions about fairness, politics, and the future of the death penalty.
Florida’s Unprecedented Execution Pace Under Governor DeSantis
Florida’s execution of Bryan Jennings on November 13, 2025, marked the state’s 16th death by lethal injection this year. This staggering number places Florida at the top of national execution statistics, far outpacing Texas and other states historically known for frequent use of capital punishment. Governor Ron DeSantis’s administration has become synonymous with aggressive death penalty enforcement, signing more death warrants and expediting the process through legislative changes that require less jury consensus than federal law demands.
Jennings, a Marine Corps veteran, was convicted for the 1979 rape and murder of a six-year-old girl. His execution was the latest in a series where military veterans made up a disproportionate share of those put to death. Critics argue that Florida’s willingness to execute veterans signals a disregard for mitigating factors like trauma and service-related mental illness. Defense attorneys and advocacy groups have called for reforms, pointing to Jennings and others as emblematic of a system that punishes without sufficient consideration of background or rehabilitation potential.
Legal Loopholes and Political Motivations Fuel Execution Rate
Florida’s legal system stands apart from most states by allowing death sentences without unanimous jury recommendations. This procedural shortcut has made it easier for prosecutors to secure death sentences and for the governor’s office to push forward with executions at a rapid pace. The clemency process remains largely opaque, described by Jennings’s counsel as a “secret administrative ritual,” offering little hope of reprieve even in cases with compelling mitigating evidence.
Governor DeSantis’s tough-on-crime stance has been a political hallmark, especially during his presidential campaign. Observers note that the surge in executions is more than just a legal maneuver—it’s a calculated demonstration of power and resolve aimed at appealing to conservative voters who view capital punishment as a necessary tool for justice and deterrence. While victims’ families have expressed relief and closure, others, including some relatives, have chosen forgiveness, highlighting the complexity of emotions and ethics surrounding each case.
The Veteran Factor: Trauma, Justice, and Public Outcry
Nearly one-third of those executed in Florida over the past two years have been military veterans. This pattern has sparked fierce debate among lawmakers, veteran advocacy groups, and the public. Art Cody, a leading voice at the Center for Veteran Criminal Advocacy, asserts that the state is not intentionally targeting veterans but fails to account for their unique circumstances when pursuing capital punishment. The conversation has shifted from mere statistics to stories—of trauma, service, and the limits of retributive justice.
Legal scholars and criminal justice reformers continue to challenge Florida’s approach, calling for the state to adopt trauma-informed sentencing and more transparent clemency reviews. The Florida Supreme Court, while serving as a check on death penalty cases, has mostly upheld the governor’s decisions, even as dissenting justices warn against the erosion of safeguards meant to prevent wrongful or unjust executions.
The execution of Jennings and others has brought national attention to the intersection of criminal justice and veterans’ issues, with advocacy organizations pushing for reforms and reconsideration of how the system treats those who once served the nation. The debate is far from settled, and each new execution intensifies the scrutiny of Florida’s process and priorities.
Implications for Florida and Beyond
Florida’s record-setting execution pace reverberates beyond state borders. The short-term effects include closure for some families, heightened debate over the ethics and logistics of capital punishment, and increased polarization between advocates and opponents. In the long-term, these developments may lead to legal reforms both within Florida and nationally, as lawmakers and the public grapple with the consequences of accelerated executions, especially for vulnerable populations like veterans.
Economic costs associated with death penalty litigation and execution procedures continue to rise. Socially, the controversy has deepened divides, with the military community and reform advocates demanding greater recognition of service-related trauma in sentencing. Politically, DeSantis’s actions may shape his legacy and influence broader debates about state authority, justice, and the limits of punishment in America.
Sources:
Death Penalty Information Center









