Cruz UNLEASHES Attack — Greene Gets Crushed!

Man speaking passionately into a microphone on stage.

When a prominent Republican senator publicly tells voters to ignore a sitting GOP congresswoman by calling her “very liberal,” the party’s internal fractures have moved far beyond backroom whispers.

Story Snapshot

Ted Cruz labeled Marjorie Taylor Greene “very liberal” and advised voters to ignore her
Greene criticized Israel’s Gaza actions and Republican leadership’s healthcare failures
The public dispute highlights deepening Republican Party divisions during a government shutdown
Other GOP leaders including Speaker Johnson have also dismissed Greene’s positions

The Unlikely Liberal Label

Ted Cruz delivered his stunning assessment during a CNBC “Squawk Box” appearance, branding Greene as increasingly liberal due to her recent policy positions. The Texas senator specifically cited Greene’s criticism of Israel’s military actions in Gaza, calling them genocide, and her advocacy for affordable healthcare solutions. Cruz warned that criticism of Israel serves as a “gateway” to liberalism, urging Americans to dismiss Greene’s evolving stance entirely.

The irony runs deep considering Greene’s history as one of the most conservative voices in Congress since her 2020 election. Her previous unwavering support for Trump and far-right positions made her an unlikely target for liberal accusations from within her own party. Yet here stands Cruz, a leading conservative voice since 2013, publicly rebuking a colleague who once shared his ideological trenches.

Healthcare and Shutdown Politics Drive Wedge

Greene’s criticism intensified during the ongoing 2025 government shutdown, where she challenged Republican leadership’s handling of negotiations. She specifically targeted Speaker Mike Johnson and the party’s lack of an affordable healthcare alternative, traditionally Democratic talking points that raised eyebrows among GOP ranks. Senator Bernie Moreno joined the criticism, urging Greene to propose concrete legislative solutions rather than just pointing out problems.

The timing proves particularly damaging for Republican unity. During high-stakes shutdown negotiations, public infighting weakens the party’s bargaining position and creates ammunition for Democratic opponents. Greene’s willingness to air grievances publicly rather than through internal channels violates unwritten rules of party discipline that senior members like Cruz view as essential for legislative effectiveness.

Israel Criticism Crosses Conservative Red Lines

Greene’s July 2025 comments calling Israel’s Gaza actions “war crimes” represent her most significant departure from Republican orthodoxy. Support for Israel remains one of the GOP’s most consistent foreign policy positions, making Greene’s criticism particularly jarring to party leadership. Political analysts note that Republican criticism of Israel is extraordinarily rare and signals potential shifts in the party’s foreign policy debates.

Cruz’s response suggests party leadership views Greene’s Israel stance as a litmus test for conservative credentials. His “gateway to liberalism” framing attempts to marginalize her position by associating it with broader ideological drift. This approach reflects traditional Republican efforts to maintain party discipline through peer pressure and public rebuke when members stray from established positions.

Party Fractures Expose Deeper Tensions

The Cruz-Greene dispute illuminates broader Republican struggles over party identity in the post-Trump era. Greene’s “America First” rhetoric once aligned perfectly with party messaging, but her willingness to criticize traditional GOP allies like Israel and advocate for healthcare reform challenges established conservative priorities. Her growing independence threatens traditional party hierarchies that rely on message discipline and unified opposition to Democratic initiatives.

These divisions carry significant implications for upcoming electoral cycles. Primary challenges could emerge from both directions, with establishment Republicans targeting Greene-aligned candidates while America First supporters challenge traditional conservatives. The public nature of this dispute provides Democratic opponents with ready-made campaign material highlighting Republican dysfunction and policy confusion during critical governance moments.