Five Relatives Killed Across Three Scenes

Five members of a single East St. Louis family were gunned down across three locations, and the teen suspects’ alleged motives are still officially unanswered even as community whispers grow louder.

Story Snapshot

  • Five relatives were killed and two injured in what police call a targeted family shooting in East St. Louis.
  • A 15-year-old girl and her 16-year-old boyfriend, both relatives of the victims, are jailed and charged.
  • Authorities say the investigation is active and will not yet confirm any motive for the attacks.
  • Family members and neighbors share motive claims and deep frustration as trust in the system erodes.

How a family was targeted across three locations

Illinois State Police say five people were killed and two others wounded in East St. Louis in what they describe as a targeted mass shooting against one family. The attacks happened mainly on Sunday across three different places: Jones Park, a home near 39th Street and Summit, and the Samuel Gompers public housing complex. Troopers arrested two teen suspects after stopping a vehicle at Holten State Park following a chase, linking them to the shootings spread across the city.

Officials have identified the five people killed as Cherie L. May, 49, Shania W. Thompson, 25, Devin D. May, 24, Quentin L. Thompson, 21, and Patricia A. May, 74. Police say the victims were related and that at least one suspect is also a family member, reinforcing the view that the attacks focused on one extended household. The ages of the victims show several generations wiped out in a single weekend, a detail that has shocked local residents and city leaders.

The teen suspects and the charges they face

Prosecutors have charged a 16-year-old boy, named in media reports as Ja’ymier Davis, with 12 felony counts tied to the killings, including five counts of murder and additional charges linked to the non-fatal shootings. He will be tried as an adult in St. Clair County, while the case against his 15-year-old girlfriend, a relative of the victims, begins in juvenile court and may later move to adult court. Police and reporters say the couple are accused of shooting seven family members, killing five of them across the three crime scenes.

Court documents show one especially disturbing allegation: Davis is accused of killing 74-year-old Patricia May and cutting off her right thumb, a detail prosecutors included among the charges of dismembering a human body. Investigators say a stolen gun was used in the attacks, adding another layer of concern over how minors get deadly weapons. Yet Illinois State Police Director Brendan Kelly has declined to explain publicly how the teens obtained the firearm, saying only that investigators are still building the case.

Official silence on motive vs. family claims and public anger

At a Sunday press conference, Director Kelly called the shootings a targeted mass attack on one family but said there is no known motive yet and refused to discuss why the teens may have done it. Charging papers filed Tuesday also do not list any motive, even though they describe the locations, victims, and timeline of the shootings. State police say the investigation remains active and “the picture is coming together,” but they insist they are not ready to answer the most basic question many people are asking: why.

That silence has opened space for other voices. The 15-year-old suspect’s father, Marcus May, told reporters his daughter was angry with family members and plotted the attacks with her boyfriend after relatives refused to let them stay and after a gun theft. Another family member, the husband of a survivor, told Chicago media he believes the couple wanted to “eliminate everybody that had a problem with the situation” so they could stay together. These claims paint a picture of domestic anger, broken trust, and easy access to weapons—issues that cut across politics and feed a sense that families are on their own.

The gap between what police will say and what families and neighbors are sharing has left the community confused and fearful. Local council members and residents have spoken of shock and of not understanding “what would make them do such a thing,” echoing a wider belief that the system keeps ordinary people in the dark. Authorities have also warned about online rumors and have held back some details, including full information on juvenile suspects, in part because of privacy laws. For many Americans on both the left and right, that pattern feels familiar: officials talk about process, while families bury loved ones and search for simple, human answers.

What this case shows about youth violence and a strained system

Researchers who study mass shootings say many attackers share common paths: personal crisis, family conflict, access to guns, and a growing sense of grievance. In cases involving teenagers, especially where family members are the victims, law enforcement often delays motive discussion to protect ongoing questioning and to comply with laws about minors. That caution may help prosecutors in court, but it also feeds public suspicion that the “deep state” or political leaders care more about their image than about open, honest communication when tragedy strikes.

The East St. Louis case adds one more painful example to that larger story. Neighbors in a struggling city watched a family get torn apart across parks and housing projects while officials spoke in careful legal language and urged patience. People who already feel ignored by Washington see teen relatives accused of killing their own kin with a stolen gun, and they hear different stories about why it happened, but still no clear plan to stop the next one. Whether you worry most about broken families, guns in young hands, or government secrecy, this case sits at the crossroads of all those fears—and reminds many that the promise of safety and fairness from the federal system is wearing thin.

Sources:

foxnews.com, bnd.com, abc7chicago.com, chicagotribune.com, cbsnews.com, audacy.com, theguardian.com, jaapl.org