TRUMP ASSASSIN’S Bizarre Courtroom Scheme – Circus!

Would-be Trump assassin Ryan Routh has been blocked from asking potential jurors bizarre questions about pro-Palestinian activism, Trump’s Greenland proposals, and turtle road crossings, exposing the dangerous lengths leftist extremists will go to manipulate our justice system.

Story Snapshot

Ryan Routh, accused of attempting to assassinate President Trump, was barred from asking irrelevant political questions during jury selection
His proposed questions included views on pro-Palestinian student activism, Trump’s Greenland acquisition plans, and ethical scenarios about turtle crossings
The court rejected these hair-brained attempts to politicize jury selection and inject leftist talking points into legal proceedings
Routh is representing himself in the assassination attempt trial, creating additional security and procedural concerns

Court Blocks Assassination Suspect’s Political Agenda

Ryan Routh’s attempt to turn his assassination trial into a political circus demonstrates how far leftist extremists will go to advance their agenda. The would-be Trump assassin sought to question potential jurors about their stance on pro-Palestinian student activism, clearly attempting to stack the jury with sympathizers who share his radical worldview. This calculated move reveals the intersection between anti-American campus movements and violent political extremism that patriots have long warned about.

Bizarre Questions Expose Leftist Strategy

Routh’s proposed jury questions went beyond typical voir dire procedures, including inquiries about Trump’s strategic Greenland acquisition proposal and even hypothetical scenarios about stopping for turtle road crossings. These seemingly random topics were designed to assess jurors’ political leanings and ethical frameworks, potentially identifying those who oppose Trump’s America First policies. The court rightfully recognized these questions as inappropriate attempts to politicize legal proceedings and undermine the impartial justice system our Constitution guarantees.

Self-Representation Creates Additional Security Risks

By choosing to represent himself, Routh has created unprecedented security challenges for the court system while positioning himself to grandstand his anti-Trump ideology. This decision allows him direct access to jury selection processes, which he clearly intended to exploit for political purposes. The assassination suspect’s behavior in court proceedings reflects the same dangerous mindset that led to his alleged attempt on President Trump’s life at his Florida golf course.

Protecting Justice From Political Manipulation

The court’s decision to block Routh’s inappropriate questions represents a crucial victory for judicial integrity against leftist attempts to weaponize our legal system. This case highlights how anti-Trump extremists seek to infiltrate every aspect of American institutions, from universities promoting pro-Palestinian activism to courtrooms where they attempt to manipulate jury selection. Patriots must remain vigilant against these systematic efforts to undermine constitutional processes and ensure that justice remains blind to political ideology.

The Routh case serves as a stark reminder of the violent extremism that has infected leftist political movements and their willingness to exploit any platform to advance their anti-American agenda, making President Trump’s strong leadership more essential than ever.